Three Sum

ArrayTwo Pointers
https://leetcode.com/problems/3sum

# Solution

The brute force solution doesn't sort and takes 3 nested for loops for cubic time.

Sorting(O(nlogn)O(n \log n)) was not a good practice in linear time two sum but should be used in this squared time problem.

# Vanilla Two Pointers

Sort and then use two pointers to search for satisfied result. Caveat is to look out for duplicates.

Complexity

time: O(n2)O(n^2)
space: O(n2)O(n^2)

def threeSum(self, nums: List[int]) -> List[List[int]]:
    nums.sort()
    n = len(nums)
    res = []

    for i in range(0, n-2):
        j = i+1
        k = n-1
        # avoid dup
        if i > 0 and nums[i] == nums[i-1]:
            continue
        # 2 optimizations
        if nums[i] + nums[-1] + nums[-2] < 0:
            continue
        if nums[i] + nums[i+1] + nums[i+2] > 0:
            break
        # like two-sum-ii-input-array-is-sorted
        target = -nums[i]
        while j < k:
            curr_sum = nums[j] + nums[k]
            if curr_sum == target:
                res.append([nums[i],nums[j],nums[k]])
                j += 1
                
                while j < k and nums[j] == nums[j-1]:
                    j += 1
                k -= 1
                while k > j and nums[k] == nums[k+1]:
                    k -= 1
            elif curr_sum < target:
                j += 1
            else:
                k -= 1
                
    return res
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35

# Return a Set

Also sort and then use two pointers, but the difference is returning a set rather than list.

To eliminate duplicates, use tuple rather than list for HashSet res.

Complexity

time: O(n2)O(n^2)
space: O(n2)O(n^2)

def threeSum(self, nums: List[int]) -> List[List[int]]:
    res = set()
    n = len(nums)
    nums.sort()

    for i in range(n-2):
        target = -nums[i]
        left = i + 1
        right = n - 1
        while left < right:
            # speed up a bit
            if nums[i] > 0:
                break
            if nums[left] + nums[right] == target:
                res.add((nums[i], nums[left], nums[right]))
                left += 1
                right -= 1
            elif nums[left] + nums[right] < target:
                left += 1
            else:
                right -= 1
    return res
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22